Quotes About Evolution

When I was playing with the Brooklyn Nets, we still called people soft, but we never equated it with being gay. It shows people are capable of changing language and culture.

I was always proud of being tough-minded, and I think I still am, but in my old age I've got a little softer in the head, and that's all right.

As you get older, you get different, and I'm a mushier, softer person as I get older.

I think a lot of people feel that they want something softer. Things are changing. It's about individuality, and in a way, it's romantic.

As the years go by, I've added a few pounds on, and I like it. I like it that I look a little softer.

Software is eating the world, but AI is going to eat software.

In short, software is eating the world.

Writing genetic code like we do software will usher in a completely new way of living for all of us. When this happens, our society will be as fundamentally changed as we have seen from the invention of computers.

In software design, it's all about making a guess, trying it, and then learning from the experience.

Companies in every industry need to assume that a software revolution is coming.

From day one our next generation system will run all our exsisting software - so that gives us a head start.

While the creative works from the 16th century can still be accessed and used by others, the data in some software programs from the 1990s is already inaccessible.

The days when you needed amazing Silicon Graphics machines to run animation software are gone now.

The future art historians are going to be software guys who are going to go into the depths of the code to find out what was changed hundreds of years before.

By being able to write a genome and plug it into an organism, the software, if you will, changes the hardware.

Pop belonged to more musical people in earlier times, but we've sort of gotten away from that. Now it's software people. I kind of feel like reclaiming it is in order.

The process of software development doesn't feel any better than it did a generation ago.

Before I became a game designer, I was a software engineer.

GIS started on mainframe computers; we could get one map every five to 10 hours, and if we made a mistake, it could take longer. In the early '90s, when people started buying PCs, we migrated to desktop software.

We are splintering what was the 'camera' and its functionality - lens, sensors, and processing - into distinct parts, but, instead of lenses and shutters, software and algorithms are becoming the driving force.

In the past, there was hardware, software, and platforms on top of which there were applications. Now they're getting conflated. That is all going to get disrupted by the move to the cloud.

When you go from building T-shirts to software for a presidential campaign used by a cast of millions, it's pretty easy to think, 'OK, we can build something pretty big.'

To me, it looks more or less like the hardware designers have run out of ideas and that they're trying to pass the blame for the future demise of Moore's Law to the software writers by giving us machines that work faster only on a few key benchmarks!

A big part of the success of Microsoft was that every year, the chips our software ran on got faster and cheaper. They doubled in capability every 18 months under Moore's law.